Matter-aware knowledge
Organize approved collections around matters, clients, teams, source types, access rules, retention, and conflicts. One undifferentiated search pool invites trouble.
Core specialty: legal systems
Private legal RAG with evidence, authority, and attorney control.
Redacted AI Solutions designs local legal knowledge and agentic workflows for confidential document collections: source-grounded research, comparison, chronology, internal knowledge, and governed drafting support.
Core specialty · design + pilot conversations openLocalTarget boundary
CitedEvidence goal
ScopedAgent authority
AttorneyFinal review
The point
Confidentiality makes legal AI valuable. It also makes careless automation unacceptable.
Grace can encode matter boundaries, roles, approvals, and agent authority while R.A.I.S.E. keeps retrieval and inference local. The system supports legal professionals. It does not practice law, and it does not make professional judgment optional.
Evidence-led RAG
Support document search, comparison, chronology, internal precedent orientation, and source-backed drafting with visible citations and explicit uncertainty.
Governed agents
Define what an agent may read, summarize, draft, export, or change. Require attorney approval for consequential steps. Keep a reviewable record of sources, tools, and actions.
Professional boundary
Outputs require attorney analysis, privilege and confidentiality judgment, citation verification, and professional-responsibility review. The platform is not legal advice.
Work with us
Bring a bounded legal workflow and the controls it must respect.
We welcome design and pilot conversations with legal teams that want local evidence systems without surrendering professional accountability.
Direct answers
Questions worth asking.
Does the system provide legal advice?+
No. It is infrastructure and workflow support for qualified legal professionals. Attorneys remain responsible for judgment, privilege, confidentiality, citation verification, client communication, and the work product.
Can it use confidential client documents?+
Only after the organization defines and approves the matter boundary, authority, access, storage, retention, conflicts, incident responsibilities, contracts, and technical controls. Do not submit confidential material through the public website.
Does local RAG guarantee correct citations?+
No. Retrieval and models can return incomplete or incorrect material. The system improves source visibility and reviewability. Attorney verification stays.